Here is feedback plus some questions and answers about the newspaper element which I asked Andrea via email for as I need to send to print very soon. (With time left to reorder if I need to).
My comments in Orange
Main Body of Feedback:
Feedback on assignment
Demonstration of technical and Visual Skills, Quality of Outcome, Demonstration of Creativity
At this stage of the course I have made all my comments in this section – assignment 6 has no coursework and is as such a development of work from assignment 4/5.
On the blog in the post ‘Reworking Things’ – where you have written about the distraction of the Life source material – I was reminded of the creative writing maxim of murdering your darlings – this blog post explains it well:
https://www.publicationcoach.com/why-you-must-murder-your-darlings/
Part of the development of work is the letting go of elements and realising that they don’t fit the bigger picture. A useful reminder.
With regard to submitting work that is not yet finished – this is exactly how Level 3 will work. There is often a point of not knowing where work is going, but that you also need to let go. I went to see some work recently (performance-based but a hybrid of many disciplines) and that project had been ten years in the making. As I move through the degree, it becomes more and more apparent to me that the rich, interesting and complex work I’m drawn to often takes a very long time to materialise, and sometimes it feels that much of what I’m working on now is a bit like seed-planting.
I watched this version as the final version of the film:
The work on part one has benefited greatly. The transition from heartbeat to music works with the imagery flickering. Part two on this version seemed to have no sound – is that right? There is sound but it very subtle – bits of audio-‘junk’ that interrupt the silence. I too was attached to the typewriter (see your comment below) and perhaps it is something to re-introduce or otherwise, I may need to bring more atmosphere noise in plus a few more snippets of audio-junk. There is indeed a section of absolute silence too – the absence of anything is a kind of key thing I was exploring. If I listen to the film on my noisy Mac I don’t get this but when I listen to it on my phone the subtle soundtrack of vignette 2 is noticeable. Something to look at before submission perhaps, if there is time. I was quite attached to the typewriter/voiceover from previous versions. The repeated sections of audio in Part Three work with the repetition of similar imagery combined together.
With regard to comments about the work being experiential. It is for me, work that is immersive. Bill Viola, as we have discussed before is a key example. Watching this through again I am reminded of The Family of Man exhibition curated by Steichen – although I have never seen the exhibition, the stills from it make me think that this was a curation in a similar immersive format with the common themes of humanity throughout. Within your work there are cultural references that we can read and understand in their singular parts but it is the whole piece with juxtaposition of sound/speech that creates a meaning that is may feel intangible at first to the viewer.
In a similar vein I am reminded of Danny Boyle’s Opening Ceremony of the 2012 Olympic Games as a seemingly eclectic series of tableaux – something again that was an experience to view.
Having review the work for assignment 2 and 3, these reworks are justified. The essay you have worked hard to reduce the words and focus the topic. There is a much larger piece of work should you wish to expand it back out. I think this essay explores on-going concerns of mine which link to the AV pieces so yes, in one way or another I will keep working on these themes.
Email feedback re newspaper:
My questions and comments to Andrea were:
1. It was initially conceived to support the module but as its evolved I think it supports the two films I made. How do you feel about the other work in it? i.e. the typology, invention of childhood, the final image which I might swap.
2. It has none of my written thoughts included just relevant quotes. However, I plan to send it with a separate statement but I’m confused by its dual purpose – an assessment aid / a piece of work in its own right that contains my overall themes and concepts. What do you think of that plan? I think, write the statement aimed at its second purpose.
3. I will make it very clear the films are the main thing, not the newspaper
Andrea answered immediately pretty much, due to time constraints, for which I was grateful:
1. For me, it works as an expressive piece to sit alongside but not duplicate the films. The final image is there is a problem with is in the coloured block for me – but realise that you need that graphically to work for the fragments of images. Is that the back page? If so you could just continue the front page round a wrap?
2. No written work by you is ok. I see this very much as a separate but associated piece of work. It is not an explanation of the work or meant to document the process of a project. It is not uncommon in degree shows for there to be a final piece(s) and then a book or pamphlet that is not the same as the work on the walls (or projected).
3. Agree entirely! There is a good precedent for newsprint at the moment. Giles Duley I know has done at least one newspaper for his Legacy of War project – realise this is photojournalism so the newsprint suits the genre. Also Chris Killip has a limited edition of newsprint ‘books’ of projects.